Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Innocent?

I guess M.J. is "innocent." I didn't think they'd find him guilty, unfortunately. The evidence seemed too weak. But this brings me to a point I want to know...

Michael Jackson is an oddity; I've always thought so. I'm not surprised that he was under investigation the first time. I wish they'd had a stronger case this second time, but no such luck. But I guess my big question remains: WHY did these parents send their kid to Neverland knowing he is freakish and had been accused in the past? Would I let M.J within 100 feet of my child? No way!!! Let him spend the night at M.J's house? NEVER. So why do these other parents?

I was reading that M.J. said he won't share his bed with kids anymore. He never should have in the first place, not at those ages, and especially not with someone else's child. However, he isn't saying he's keeping away from all children. That's what I really think should be happening.

My gut feeling is that he did it. And I am certain he did because he was abused by his own father as a child. Someone needs to get him in for intensive counseling, and then they need to make sure he is NEVER left unsupervised with a child ever again. If we can't find him guilty, someone needs to step in and protect any other children.

2 comments:

Ben Sima said...

I completely disagree with you. My gut feeling is that you are speaking from what you have heard or saw on TV. The media makes alot of things seem to be one thing, when they are really something else. I have heard from a trusted source and someone that met Michael in person that he is completely sane. This person was in a room with Michael and his kid-friends for an interview. Not only were there boys with Michael, but girls too. And no sexual references, gestures, looks, whatever were made.

Roundtable Review Staff said...

True, I can only speak from what the media shows. But for me, one of the news shows listed the evidence. There were books of child porn locked away in M.J'S desk that had both his fingerprints and the child's fingerprints. I am adamantly against child porn and cannot forgive any man that would keep it in his home OR show it to a child.